Commit Graph

8 Commits (master)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Pfeifer 48380a1370
Do not assign variables to base workspace by default
Related to https://git.dynare.org/Dynare/preprocessor/-/issues/95
2023-12-18 11:51:27 +01:00
Sébastien Villemot df9c7d85b8
Error out if perfect_foresight_solver is called with shocks(learnt_in=…) or endval(learnt_in=…) blocks
This is to prevent the accidental use of the regular perfect foresight solver
when one actually wants the one with expectation errors.
2023-10-20 16:05:53 -04:00
Sébastien Villemot d5a3a8e16a
Various improvements to perfect foresight homotopy
– new option “endval_steady” to pf_setup command to recompute terminal
  steady state in the homotopy loop

– new options “homotopy_linearization_fallback” and
  “homotopy_marginal_linearization_fallback” to pf_solver and pfwee_solver
  commands, to get an approximate solution when homotopy fails to go to 100%

– new options “homotopy_initial_step_size”, “homotopy_min_step_size”,
  “homotopy_step_size_increase_success_count” and “homotopy_max_completion_share”
  to pf_solver and pfwee_solver commands to fine tune the homotopy behaviour

– removed option “homotopy_alt_starting_point” to pf_solver command, not really
  useful

– new options “steady_solve_algo”, “steady_tolf”, “steady_tolx”,
  “steady_maxit”, “steady_markowitz” to pf_solver and pfwee_solver commands, to
  control the computation of the terminal steady state (and remove the
  equivalent options which previously had different names in pfwee_solver command)
2023-06-21 15:58:23 +02:00
Sébastien Villemot c1b78e26ac
perfect_foresight_with_expectation_errors_{setup,solver}: streamline handling of guess values
– Remove the terminal_steady_state_as_guess_value option to pfwee_solver
– pfwee_setup now sets the same guess values as pf_setup (i.e. terminal steady
  state at all periods)
– With constant_simulation_length option, pfwee_solver uses terminal steady
  state as guess values for periods that are added to the simulation
2023-06-15 15:37:48 +02:00
Sébastien Villemot 37870e4a40
evaluate_steady_state: accept exogenous steady state as argument instead of whole oo_ structure
This is a move towards a more functional programming style.
2023-06-07 17:58:19 +02:00
Sébastien Villemot 1b47c8a5e5
Drop the “periods” statement 2023-01-16 16:52:40 +01:00
Sébastien Villemot 8488674ce4
New shocks(learnt_in=…) and endval(learnt_in=…) blocks
For use with perfect_foresight_with_expectation_errors_setup.
2022-04-21 17:10:52 +02:00
Sébastien Villemot abd64c256e
New perfect_foresight_with_expectation_errors_{setup,solver} commands
These command solve the problem where agents think they know perfectly the
future (they behave as in perfect foresight), but make expectation errors.
Hence they can potentially be surprised in every period, and their expectations
about the future (incl. the final steady state) may change.

Currently the sequence of information sets needs to be passed through a CSV
file. Another interface may be added in the future.

The algorithm uses a sequence of (true) perfect foresight simulations (not
necessarily as many as there are periods, because if the information set does
not change between two periods, there is no need to do a new computation).

There are two possibilities for guess values:
— the default is to use the initial steady state for the simulation using the
  first-period information set; then use previously simulated values as guess
  values
— alternatively, with the terminal_steady_state_as_guess_value option, use the
  terminal steady state as guess value for all future periods (this is actually
  what the “true” perfect foresight solver does by default)
2021-07-09 18:16:46 +02:00