dynare/tests/identification/BrockMirman/BrockMirman.mod

58 lines
1.6 KiB
Modula-2

% =========================================================================
% Stochastic growth model of Brock and Mirman (1972) with technology shock
% Willi Mutschler, January 2018
% willi@mutschler.eu
% =========================================================================
var
C ${C}$ (long_name='consumption')
K ${K}$ (long_name='capital')
A ${Z}$ (long_name='total factor productivity')
;
varobs C;
varexo
eps_A ${\varepsilon_A}$ (long_name='TFP shock')
;
parameters
alph ${\alpha}$ (long_name='capital share')
betta ${\beta}$ (long_name='discount factor')
rhoA ${\rho_A}$ (long_name='persistence TFP')
sigA ${\sigma_A}$ (long_name='standard deviation TFP shock')
;
alph = 0.35;
betta = 0.99;
rhoA = 0.9;
sigA = 0.6;
model;
[name='Euler equation']
C^(-1)=alph*betta*C(+1)^(-1)*A(+1)*K^(alph-1);
[name='capital law of motion']
K=A*K(-1)^alph-C;
[name='exogenous TFP process']
log(A)=rhoA*log(A(-1))+sigA*eps_A;
end;
shocks;
var eps_A = 1;
end;
steady_state_model;
A = 1; % technology level
K = (alph*betta*A)^(1/(1-alph)); % capital level
C = A*K^alph-K; % consumption level
end;
steady; % compute steady state given the starting values
resid; % check the starting values for the steady state
check; % check Blanchard & Khan rank condition
@#ifdef kronflag
identification(ar=3, useautocorr=1, nodisplay, nograph, parameter_set=calibration, analytic_derivation_mode=@{kronflag});
@#else
identification(ar=3, useautocorr=1, nodisplay, nograph, parameter_set=calibration, analytic_derivation_mode=0);
@#endif