stepan
/
dynare
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dynare/doc/bvar-a-la-sims.tex

659 lines
27 KiB
TeX
Raw Permalink Blame History

\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{breaklinks=true,pagecolor=white,colorlinks=true,linkcolor=blue,citecolor=blue,urlcolor=blue}
\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\newcommand{\df}{\text{df}}
\begin{document}
\title{BVAR models ``\`a la Sims'' in Dynare\thanks{Copyright \copyright~2007--2015 S\'ebastien
Villemot; \copyright~2016--2017 S\'ebastien
Villemot and Johannes Pfeifer. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify
this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation
License, Version 1.3 or any later version published by the Free
Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover
Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license can be found
at: \url{https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt}
\newline
\indent Many thanks to Christopher Sims for providing his BVAR
MATLAB\textsuperscript{\textregistered}~routines, to St\'ephane Adjemian and Michel Juillard
for their helpful support, and to Marek Jaroci\'nski for reporting a bug.
}}
\author{S\'ebastien Villemot\thanks{Paris School of Economics and
CEPREMAP.} \and Johannes Pfeifer\thanks{University of the Bundeswehr Munich. E-mail: \href{mailto:johannes.pfeifer@unibw.de}{\texttt{johannes.pfeifer@unibw.de}}.}}
\date{First version: September 2007 \hspace{1cm} This version: May 2017}
\maketitle
\begin{abstract}
Dynare incorporates routines for Bayesian VAR models estimation, using a
flavor of the so-called ``Minnesota priors.'' These routines can be used
alone or in parallel with a DSGE estimation. This document describes their
implementation and usage.
\end{abstract}
If you are impatient to try the software and wish to skip mathematical details, jump to section \ref{dynare-commands}.
\section{Model setting}
Consider the following VAR(p) model:
$$y'_t = y'_{t-1}\beta_1 + y'_{t-2}\beta_2 + \ldots + y'_{t-p}\beta_p + x'_t\alpha + u_t$$
where:
\begin{itemize}
\item $t = 1\ldots T$ is the time index
\item $y_t$ is a column vector of $ny$ endogenous variables
\item $x_t$ a column vector of $nx$ exogenous variables
\item the residuals $u_t \sim \mathcal{N}(0, \Sigma_u)$ are i.i.d. (with $\Sigma$ a $ny\times ny$ matrix)
\item $\beta_1,\beta_2,\ldots,\beta_p$ are $ny\times ny$ matrices
\item $\alpha$ is a $nx\times ny$ matrix
\end{itemize}
In the actual implementation, exogenous variables $x_t$ are either empty ($nx = 0$), or only include a constant (so that $nx = 1$ and $x'_t = (1, \ldots, 1)$). This alternative is controlled by options \texttt{constant} (the default) and \texttt{noconstant} (see section \ref{sec-model-prior-options}).
The matrix form of the model is:
$$Y = X\Phi + U$$
where:
\begin{itemize}
\item $Y$ and $U$ are $T\times ny$
\item $X$ is $T\times k$ where $k = ny\cdot p + nx$
\item $\Phi$ is $k \times ny$
\end{itemize}
In other words:
$$Y = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
y_1 \\
\vdots \\
y_T \\
\end{array}
\right]
\; X = \left[
\begin{array}{cccc}
y_0 & \ldots & y_{1-p} & x_1 \\
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots \\
y_{T-1} & \ldots & y_{T-p} & x_T
\end{array}
\right]
\; \Phi = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
\beta_1 \\
\vdots \\
\beta_p \\
\alpha \\
\end{array}
\right]$$
\section{Constructing the prior}
\label{sec-prior}
We need a prior distribution over the parameters $(\Phi, \Sigma)$ before moving to Bayesian estimation. This section describes the construction of the prior used in Dynare implementation.
The prior is made of three components, which are described in the following subsections.
\subsection{Diffuse prior}
The first component of the prior is, by default, Jeffreys' improper prior:
$$p_1(\Phi,\Sigma) \propto |\Sigma|^{-(ny+1)/2}$$
However, it is possible to choose a flat prior by specifying option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_flat}. In, that case:
$$p_1(\Phi, \Sigma) = \text{const}$$
\subsection{Dummy observations prior}
The second component of the prior is constructed from the likelihood of $T^*$ dummy observations $(Y^*,X^*)$:
$$p_2(\Phi, \Sigma) \propto |\Sigma|^{-T^*/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(Y^*-X^*\Phi)'(Y^*-X^*\Phi))\right\}$$
The dummy observations are constructed according to Sims' version of the Minnesota prior.\footnote{See Doan, Litterman and Sims (1984).}
Before constructing the dummy observations, one needs to choose values for the following parameters:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\tau$: the overall tightness of the prior. Large values imply a small prior covariance matrix. Controlled by option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_tau}, with a default of 3
\item $d$: the decay factor for scaling down the coefficients of lagged values. Controlled by option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_decay}, with a default of 0.5
\item $\omega$ controls the tightness for the prior on $\Sigma$. Must be an integer. Controlled by option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_omega}, with a default of 1
\item $\lambda$ and $\mu$: additional tuning parameters, respectively controlled by option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_lambda} (with a default of 5) and option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_mu} (with a default of 2)
\item based on a short presample $Y^0$ (in Dynare implementation, this
presample consists of the $p$ observations used to initialize the VAR, plus
one extra observation at the beginning of the sample\footnote{In Dynare 4.2.1
and older versions, only $p$ observations where used. As a consequence the
case $p=1$ was buggy, since the standard error of a one observation sample
is undefined.}), one also calculates $\sigma = std(Y^0)$ and $\bar{y} =
mean(Y^0)$
\end{itemize}
Below is a description of the different dummy observations. For the sake of simplicity, we should assume that $ny = 2$, $nx = 1$ and $p = 3$. The generalization is straigthforward.
\begin{itemize}
\item Dummies for the coefficients on the first lag:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
\tau\sigma_1 & 0 \\
0 & \tau\sigma_2
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
\tau\sigma_1 & 0 & 0&0& 0&0& 0 \\
0 & \tau\sigma_2 & 0&0& 0&0& 0
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
\item Dummies for the coefficients on the second lag:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
0 & 0 \\
0 & 0
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
0&0& \tau\sigma_1 2^d & 0 & 0&0& 0 \\
0&0& 0 & \tau\sigma_2 2^d & 0&0& 0
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
\item Dummies for the coefficients on the third lag:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
0 & 0 \\
0 & 0
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
0&0& 0&0& \tau\sigma_1 3^d & 0 & 0 \\
0&0& 0&0& 0 & \tau\sigma_2 3^d & 0 \\
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
\item The prior for the covariance matrix is implemented by:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
\sigma_1 & 0 \\
0 & \sigma_2
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
0&0& 0&0& 0&0& 0 \\
0&0& 0&0& 0&0& 0
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
These observations are replicated $\omega$ times.
\item Co-persistence prior dummy observation, reflecting the belief that when data on all $y$'s are stable at their initial levels, they will tend to persist at that level:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
\lambda\bar{y}_1 & \lambda\bar{y}_2
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
\lambda\bar{y}_1 & \lambda\bar{y}_2 & \lambda\bar{y}_1 & \lambda\bar{y}_2 & \lambda\bar{y}_1 & \lambda\bar{y}_2 & \lambda
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
\textit{Note:} in the implementation, if $\lambda < 0$, the exogenous variables will not be included in the dummy. In that case, the dummy observation becomes:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
-\lambda\bar{y}_1 & -\lambda\bar{y}_2
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
-\lambda\bar{y}_1 & -\lambda\bar{y}_2 & -\lambda\bar{y}_1 & -\lambda\bar{y}_2 & -\lambda\bar{y}_1 & -\lambda\bar{y}_2 & 0
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
\item Own-persistence prior dummy observations, reflecting the belief that when $y_i$ has been
stable at its initial level, it will tend to persist at that level, regardless of the value of
other variables:
$$\left[
\begin{array}{cc}
\mu\bar{y}_1 & 0 \\
0 & \mu\bar{y}_2
\end{array}
\right]
=
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccccc}
\mu\bar{y}_1 & 0 & \mu\bar{y}_1 &0 & \mu\bar{y}_1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & \mu\bar{y}_2 & 0 & \mu\bar{y}_2 & 0 &\mu\bar{y}_2 & 0
\end{array}
\right]\Phi + U$$
\end{itemize}
This makes a total of $T^* = ny\cdot p + ny\cdot\omega + 1 + ny = ny\cdot(p+\omega+1)+1$ dummy observations.
\subsection{Training sample prior}
The third component of the prior is constructed from the likelihood of $T^-$ observations $(Y^-,X^-)$ extracted from the beginning of the sample:
$$p_3(\Phi, \Sigma) \propto |\Sigma|^{-T^-/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(Y^--X^-\Phi)'(Y^--X^-\Phi))\right\}$$
In other words, the complete sample is divided in two parts such that $T = T^- + T^+$,
$Y = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
Y^- \\
Y^+
\end{array}
\right]$ and
$X = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
X^- \\
X^+
\end{array}
\right]$.
The size of the training sample $T^-$ is controlled by option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_train}. It is null by default.
\section{Characterization of the prior and posterior distributions}
\textit{Notation:} in the following, we will use a small ``$p$'' as superscript for notations related to the prior, and a capital ``$P$'' for notations related to the posterior.
\subsection{Prior distribution}
\label{prior-distrib}
We define the following notations:
\begin{itemize}
\item $T^p = T^* + T^-$
\item
$Y^p = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
Y^* \\
Y^-
\end{array}
\right]$
\item
$X^p = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
X^* \\
X^-
\end{array}
\right]$
\item $\df^p = T^p - k$ if $p_1$ is Jeffrey's prior, or $\df^p = T^p - k - ny - 1$ if $p_1$ is a constant
\end{itemize}
With these notations, one can see that the prior is:
\begin{eqnarray*}
p(\Phi, \Sigma) & = & p_1(\Phi, \Sigma)\cdot p_2(\Phi, \Sigma)\cdot p_3(\Phi, \Sigma) \\
& \propto & |\Sigma|^{-(\df^p + ny + 1 + k)/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(Y^p-X^p\Phi)'(Y^p-X^p\Phi))\right\}
\end{eqnarray*}
We define the following notations:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\hat{\Phi^p} = ({X^p}'X^p)^{-1} {X^p}' Y^p$ the linear regression of $X^p$ on $Y^p$
\item $S^p = (Y^p - X^p\hat{\Phi^p})'(Y^p - X^p\hat{\Phi^p})$
\end{itemize}
After some manipulations, one obtains:
\begin{eqnarray*}
p(\Phi, \Sigma) & \propto & |\Sigma|^{-(\df^p + ny + 1 + k)/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(S^p + (\Phi-\hat{\Phi^p})'{X^p}'X^p(\Phi-\hat{\Phi^p})))\right\} \\
& \propto & |\Sigma|^{-(\df^p + ny + 1)/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}S^p)\right\} \times \\
& & |\Sigma|^{-k/2}\exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(\Phi-\hat{\Phi^p})'{X^p}'X^p(\Phi-\hat{\Phi^p})))\right\}
\end{eqnarray*}
From the above decomposition, one can see that the prior distribution is such that:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\Sigma$ is distributed according to an inverse-Wishart distribution, with $\df^p$ degrees of freedom and parameter $S^p$
\item conditionally to $\Sigma$, matrix $\Phi$ is distributed according to a matrix-normal distribution, with mean $\hat{\Phi^p}$ and variance-covariance parameters $\Sigma$ and $({X^p}'X^p)^{-1}$
\end{itemize}
\emph{Remark concerning the degrees of freedom of the inverse-Wishart:} the inverse-Wishart distribution requires the number of degrees of freedom to be greater or equal than the number of variables, i.e. $\df^p \geq ny$. When the \texttt{bvar\_prior\_flat} option is not specified, we have:
$$\df^p = T^p - k = ny\cdot(p+\omega+1)+1+T^--ny\cdot p-nx = ny\cdot(\omega+1)+T^-$$
so that the condition is always fulfilled. When \texttt{bvar\_prior\_flat} option is specified, we have:
$$\df^p = ny\cdot w + T^- - 1$$
so that with the defaults ($\omega = 1$ and $T^- = 0$) the condition is not met. The user needs to increase either \texttt{bvar\_prior\_omega} or \texttt{bvar\_prior\_train}.
\subsection{Posterior distribution}
Using Bayes formula, the posterior density is given by:
\begin{equation}
\label{bayes-formula}
p(\Phi, \Sigma | Y^+, X^+) = \frac{p(Y^+ | \Phi, \Sigma, X^+) \cdot p(\Phi, \Sigma)}{p(Y^+ | X^+)}
\end{equation}
The posterior kernel is:
$$p(\Phi, \Sigma | Y^+, X^+) \propto p(Y^+ | \Phi, \Sigma, X^+) \cdot p(\Phi, \Sigma)$$
Since the likelihood is given by:
$$p(Y^+ | \Phi, \Sigma, X^+) = (2\pi)^{-\frac{T^+ \cdot ny}{2}} |\Sigma|^{\frac{T^+}{2}} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(Y^+-X^+\Phi)'(Y^+-X^+\Phi))\right\}$$
We obtain the following posterior kernel, when combining with the prior:
$$p(\Phi, \Sigma | Y^+, X^+) \propto |\Sigma|^{-(\df^P + ny + 1 + k)/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(Y^P-X^P\Phi)'(Y^P-X^P\Phi))\right\}$$
where:
\begin{itemize}
\item $T^P = T^+ + T^p = T^+ + T^- + T^*$
\item $Y^P = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
Y^p \\
Y^+
\end{array}
\right]
= \left[
\begin{array}{c}
Y^* \\
Y^- \\
Y^+
\end{array}
\right]$
\item $X^P = \left[
\begin{array}{c}
X^p \\
X^+
\end{array}
\right]
= \left[
\begin{array}{c}
X^* \\
X^- \\
X^+
\end{array}
\right]$
\item $\df^P = \df^p + T^+$. If $p_1$ is Jeffrey's prior, then $\df^P = T^P - k$. If $p_1$ is a constant, $\df^P = T^P - k - ny - 1$.
\end{itemize}
Using the same manipulations than for the prior, the posterior density can be rewritten as:
\begin{eqnarray*}
p(\Phi, \Sigma | Y^+, X^+) & \propto & |\Sigma|^{-(\df^P + ny + 1)/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}S^P)\right\} \times \\
& & |\Sigma|^{-k/2}\exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(\Phi-\hat{\Phi^P})'{X^P}'X^P(\Phi-\hat{\Phi^P})))\right\}
\end{eqnarray*}
where:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\hat{\Phi^P} = ({X^P}'X^P)^{-1} {X^P}' Y^P$ the linear regression of $X^P$ on $Y^P$
\item $S^P = (Y^P - X^P\hat{\Phi^P})'(Y^P - X^P\hat{\Phi^P})$
\end{itemize}
From the above decomposition, one can see that the posterior distribution is such that:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\Sigma$ is distributed according to an inverse-Wishart distribution, with $\df^P$ degrees of freedom and parameter $S^P$
\item conditionally to $\Sigma$, matrix $\Phi$ is distributed according to a matrix-normal distribution, with mean $\hat{\Phi^P}$ and variance-covariance parameters $\Sigma$ and $({X^P}'X^P)^{-1}$
\end{itemize}
\emph{Remark concerning the degrees of freedom of the inverse-Wishart:} in theory, the condition over the degrees of freedom of the inverse-Wishart may not be satisfied. In practice, it is not a problem, since $T^+$ is great.
\section{Marginal density}
By integrating equation (\ref{bayes-formula}) over $(\Phi, \Sigma)$, one gets:
$$p(Y^+ | X^+) = \int p(Y^+ | \Phi, \Sigma, X^+) \cdot p(\Phi, \Sigma) d\Phi d\Sigma$$
We define the following notation for the unnormalized density of a matrix-normal-inverse-Wishart:
\begin{eqnarray*}
f(\Phi,\Sigma | \df,S,\hat{\Phi},\Omega) & = & |\Sigma|^{-(\df + ny + 1)/2} \exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}S)\right\} \times \\
& & |\Sigma|^{-k/2}\exp\left\{-\frac{1}{2}Tr(\Sigma^{-1}(\Phi-\hat{\Phi})'\Omega^{-1}(\Phi-\hat{\Phi})))\right\}
\end{eqnarray*}
We also note:
$$F(\df,S,\hat{\Phi},\Omega) = \int f(\Phi,\Sigma | \df,S,\hat{\Phi},\Omega)d\Phi d\Sigma$$
The function $F$ has an analytical form, which is given by the normalization constants of matrix-normal and inverse-Wishart densities:\footnote{Function \texttt{matricint} of file \texttt{bvar\_density.m} implements the calculation of the log of $F$.}
$$F(\df,S,\hat{\Phi},\Omega) = (2\pi)^{\frac{ny\cdot k}{2}} |\Omega|^{\frac{ny}{2}} \cdot 2^{\frac{ny\cdot \df}{2}} \pi^{\frac{ny(ny-1)}{4}} |S|^{-\frac{\df}{2}} \prod_{i=1}^{ny} \Gamma\left(\frac{\df + 1 - i}{2}\right) $$
The prior density is:
$$p(\Phi, \Sigma) = c^p \cdot f(\Phi,\Sigma | \df^p,S^p,\hat{\Phi^p},({X^p}'X^p)^{-1})$$
where the normalization constant is $c^p = F(\df^p,S^p,\hat{\Phi^p},({X^p}'X^p)^{-1})$.
Combining with the likelihood, one can see that the density is:
\begin{eqnarray*}
p(Y^+ | X^+) & = & \frac{\int (2\pi)^{-\frac{T^+\cdot ny}{2}} f(\Phi,\Sigma | \df^P,S^P,\hat{\Phi^P},({X^P}'X^P)^{-1})d\Phi d\Sigma}{F(\df^p,S^p,\hat{\Phi^p},({X^p}'X^p)^{-1})} \\
& = & \frac{(2\pi)^{-\frac{T^+\cdot ny}{2}} F(\df^P,S^P,\hat{\Phi^P},({X^P}'X^P)^{-1})}{F(\df^p,S^p,\hat{\Phi^p},({X^p}'X^p)^{-1})}
\end{eqnarray*}
\section{Dynare commands}
\label{dynare-commands}
Dynare incorporates three commands related to BVAR models \`a la Sims:
\begin{itemize}
\item \texttt{bvar\_density} for computing marginal density,
\item \texttt{bvar\_forecast} for forecasting (and RMSE computation),
\item \texttt{bvar\_irf} for computing Impulse Response Functions.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Common options}
The two commands share a set of common options, which can be divided in two groups. They are described in the following subsections.
\emph{An important remark concerning options:} in Dynare, all options are global. This means that, if you have set an option in a given command, Dynare will remember this setting for subsequent commands (unless you change it again). For example, if you call \texttt{bvar\_density} with option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_tau = 2}, then all subsequent \texttt{bvar\_density} and \texttt{bvar\_forecast} commands will assume a value of 2 for \texttt{bvar\_prior\_tau}, unless you redeclare it. This remark also applies to \texttt{datafile} and similar options, which means that you can run a BVAR estimation after a Dynare estimation without having to respecify the datafile.
\subsubsection{Options related to model and prior specifications}
\label{sec-model-prior-options}
The options related to the prior are:
\begin{itemize}
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_tau} (default: 3)
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_decay} (default: 0.5)
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_lambda} (default: 5)
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_mu} (default: 2)
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_omega} (default: 1)
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_flat} (not enabled by default)
\item \texttt{bvar\_prior\_train} (default: 0)
\end{itemize}
Please refer to section \ref{sec-prior} for the discussion of their meaning.
\emph{Remark:} when option \texttt{bvar\_prior\_flat} is specified, the condition over the degrees of freedom of the inverse-Wishart distribution is not necessarily verified (see section \ref{prior-distrib}). One needs to increase either \texttt{bvar\_prior\_omega} or \texttt{bvar\_prior\_train} in that case.
It is also possible to use either option \texttt{constant} or \texttt{noconstant}, to specify whether a constant term should be included in the BVAR model. The default is to include one.
\subsubsection{Options related to the estimated dataset}
The list of (endogenous) variables of the BVAR model has to be declared through a \texttt{varobs} statement (see Dynare reference manual).
The options related to the estimated dataset are the same than for the \texttt{estimation} command (please refer to the Dynare reference manual for more details):
\begin{itemize}
\item \texttt{datafile}
\item \texttt{first\_obs}
\item \texttt{presample}
\item \texttt{nobs}
\item \texttt{prefilter}
\item \texttt{xls\_sheet}
\item \texttt{xls\_range}
\end{itemize}
Note that option \texttt{prefilter} implies option \texttt{noconstant}.
Please also note that if option \texttt{loglinear} had been specified in a previous \texttt{estimation} statement, without option \texttt{logdata}, then the BVAR model will be estimated on the log of the provided dataset, for maintaining coherence with the DSGE estimation procedure.
\emph{Restrictions related to the initialization of lags:} in DSGE estimation routines, the likelihood (and therefore the marginal density) are evaluated starting from the observation numbered \texttt{first\_obs + presample} in the datafile.\footnote{\texttt{first\_obs} points to the first observation to be used in the datafile (defaults to 1), and \texttt{presample} indicates how many observations after \texttt{first\_obs} will be used to initialize the Kalman filter (defaults to 0).} The BVAR estimation routines use the same convention (i.e. the first observation of $Y^+$ will be \texttt{first\_obs + presample}). Since we need $p$ observations to initialize the lags, and since we may also use a training sample, the user must ensure that the following condition holds (estimation will fail otherwise):
$$\texttt{first\_obs} + \texttt{presample} > \texttt{bvar\_prior\_train} + \text{number\_of\_lags}$$
\subsection{Marginal density}
The syntax for computing the marginal density is:
\medskip
\texttt{bvar\_density(}\textit{options\_list}\texttt{) }\textit{max\_number\_of\_lags}\texttt{;}
\medskip
The options are those described above.
The command will actually compute the marginal density for several models: first for the model with one lag, then with two lags, and so on up to \textit{max\_number\_of\_lags} lags. Results will be stored in a \textit{max\_number\_of\_lags} by 1 vector \texttt{oo\_.bvar.log\_marginal\_data\_density}. The command will also store the prior and posterior information into \textit{max\_number\_of\_lags} by 1 cell arrays \texttt{oo\_.bvar.prior} and \texttt{oo\_.bvar.posterior}.
\subsection{Forecasting}
The syntax for computing (out-of-sample) forecasts is:
\medskip
\texttt{bvar\_forecast(}\textit{options\_list}\texttt{) }\textit{number\_of\_lags}\texttt{;}
\medskip
In contrast to the \texttt{bvar\_density}, you need to specify the actual lag length used, not the maximum lag length. Typically, the actual lag length should be based on the results from the \texttt{bvar\_density} command.
The options are those describe above, plus a few ones:
\begin{itemize}
\item \texttt{forecast}: the number of periods over which to compute forecasts after the end of the sample (no default)
\item \texttt{bvar\_replic}: the number of replications for Monte-Carlo simulations (default: 2000)
\item \texttt{conf\_sig}: confidence interval for graphs (default: 0.9)
\end{itemize}
The \texttt{forecast} option is mandatory.
The command will draw \texttt{bvar\_replic} random samples from the posterior distribution. For each draw, it will simulate one path without shocks, and one path with shocks.
% \emph{Note:} during the random sampling process, every draw such that the associated companion matrix has eigenvalues outside the unit circle will be discarded. This is meant to avoid explosive time series, especially when using a distant prediction horizon. Since this behaviour induces a distortion of the prior distribution, a message will be displayed if draws are thus discarded, indicating how many have been (knowing that the number of accepted draws is equal to \texttt{bvar\_replic}).
The command will produce one graph per observed variable. Each graph displays:
\begin{itemize}
\item a blue line for the posterior median forecast,% (equal to the mean of the simulated paths by linearity),
\item two green lines giving the confidence interval for the forecasts without shocks,
\item two red lines giving the confidence interval for the forecasts with shocks.
\end{itemize}
Morever, if option \texttt{nobs} is specified, the command will also compute root mean squared error (RMSE) for all variables between end of sample and end of datafile.
Most results are stored for future use:
\begin{itemize}
\item mean, median, variance and confidence intervals for forecasts (with shocks) are stored in \texttt{oo\_.bvar.forecast.with\_shocks} (in time series form),
\item \textit{idem} for forecasts without shocks in \texttt{oo\_.bvar.forecast.no\_shock},
\item all simulated samples are stored in variables \texttt{sims\_no\_shock} and \texttt{sims\_with\_shocks} in file \textit{mod\_file}\texttt{/bvar\_forecast/simulations.mat}. Those variables are 3-dimensional arrays: first dimension is time, second dimension is variable (in the order of the \texttt{varobs} declaration), third dimension indexes the sample number,
\item if RMSE has been computed, results are in \texttt{oo\_.bvar.forecast.rmse}.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Impulse Response Functions}
The syntax for computing impulse response functions is:
\medskip
\texttt{bvar\_irf(}\textit{number\_of\_lags},\textit{identification\_scheme}\texttt{);}
\medskip
The \textit{identification\_scheme} option has two potential values
\begin{itemize}
\item \texttt{'Cholesky'}: uses a lower triangular factorization of the covariance matrix (default),
\item \texttt{'SquareRoot'}: uses the Matrix square root of the covariance matrix (\verb+sqrtm+ matlab's routine).
\end{itemize}
Keep in mind that the first factorization of the covariance matrix is sensible to the ordering of the variables (as declared in the mod file with \verb+var+). This is not the case of the second factorization, but its structural interpretation is, at best, unclear (the Matrix square root of a covariance matrix, $\Sigma$, is the unique symmetric matrix $A$ such that $\Sigma = AA$).\newline
If you want to change the length of the IRFs plotted by the command, you can put\\
\medskip
\texttt{options\_.irf=40;}\\
\medskip
before the \texttt{bvar\_irf}-command. Similarly, to change the coverage of the highest posterior density intervals to e.g. 60\% you can put the command\\
\medskip
\texttt{options\_.bvar.conf\_sig=0.6;}\\
\medskip
there.\newline
The mean, median, variance, and confidence intervals for IRFs are saved in \texttt{oo\_.bvar.irf}
\section{Examples}
This section presents two short examples of BVAR estimations. These examples and the associated datafile (\texttt{bvar\_sample.m}) can be found in the \texttt{tests/bvar\_a\_la\_sims} directory of the Dynare v4 subversion tree.
\subsection{Standalone BVAR estimation}
Here is a simple \texttt{mod} file example for a standalone BVAR estimation:
\begin{verbatim}
var dx dy;
varobs dx dy;
bvar_density(datafile = bvar_sample, first_obs = 20, bvar_prior_flat,
bvar_prior_train = 10) 8;
bvar_forecast(forecast = 10, bvar_replic = 10000, nobs = 200) 8;
bvar_irf(8,'Cholesky');
\end{verbatim}
Note that you must declare twice the variables used in the estimation: first with a \texttt{var} statement, then with a \texttt{varobs} statement. This is necessary to have a syntactically correct \texttt{mod} file.
The first component of the prior is flat. The prior also incorporates a training sample. Note that the \texttt{bvar\_prior\_*} options also apply to the second command since all options are global.
The \texttt{bvar\_density} command will compute marginal density for all models from 1 up to 8 lags.
The \texttt{bvar\_forecast} command will compute forecasts for a BVAR model with 8 lags, for 10 periods in the future, and with 10000 replications. Since \texttt{nobs} is specified and is such that \texttt{first\_obs + nobs - 1} is strictly less than the number of observations in the datafile, the command will also compute RMSE.
\subsection{In parallel with a DSGE estimation}
Here follows an example \texttt{mod} file, which performs both a DSGE and a BVAR estimation:
\begin{verbatim}
var dx dy;
varexo e_x e_y;
parameters rho_x rho_y;
rho_x = 0.5;
rho_y = -0.3;
model;
dx = rho_x*dx(-1)+e_x;
dy = rho_y*dy(-1)+e_y;
end;
estimated_params;
rho_x,NORMAL_PDF,0.5,0.1;
rho_y,NORMAL_PDF,-0.3,0.1;
stderr e_x,INV_GAMMA_PDF,0.01,inf;
stderr e_y,INV_GAMMA_PDF,0.01,inf;
end;
varobs dx dy;
check;
estimation(datafile = bvar_sample, mh_replic = 1200, mh_jscale = 1.3,
first_obs = 20);
bvar_density(bvar_prior_train = 10) 8;
bvar_forecast(forecast = 10, bvar_replic = 2000, nobs = 200) 8;
\end{verbatim}
Note that the BVAR commands take their \texttt{datafile} and \texttt{first\_obs} options from the \texttt{estimation} command.
\section*{References}
\noindent Doan, Thomas, Robert Litterman, and Christopher Sims (1984), ``\textit{Forecasting and Conditional Projections Using Realistic Prior Distributions}'', Econometric Reviews, \textbf{3}, 1-100
Schorfheide, Frank (2004), ``\textit{Notes on Model Evaluation}'', Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania
Sims, Christopher (2003), ``\textit{Matlab Procedures to Compute Marginal Data Densities for VARs with Minnesota and Training Sample Priors}'', Department of Economics, Princeton University
\end{document}
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink