parent
0779816457
commit
947402c197
80
NEWS.md
80
NEWS.md
|
@ -1,3 +1,83 @@
|
|||
Announcement for Dynare 5.1 (on 2022-04-06)
|
||||
===========================================
|
||||
|
||||
We are pleased to announce the release of Dynare 5.1.
|
||||
|
||||
This maintenance release fixes various bugs.
|
||||
|
||||
The Windows, macOS and source packages are already available for download at
|
||||
[the Dynare website](https://www.dynare.org/download/).
|
||||
|
||||
All users are strongly encouraged to upgrade.
|
||||
|
||||
This release is compatible with MATLAB versions ranging from 8.3 (R2014a) to
|
||||
9.12 (R2022a), and with GNU Octave version 6.4.0 (under Windows).
|
||||
|
||||
Here is a list of the problems identified in version 5.0 and that have been
|
||||
fixed in version 5.1:
|
||||
|
||||
* Various problems with perfect foresight simulations in combination with
|
||||
`block` and/or `bytecode` options of the `model` block:
|
||||
+ Simulation with `bytecode` and `stack_solve_algo=4` could give incorrect
|
||||
results if the model has a linear block of type “Solve two boundaries
|
||||
simple/complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `bytecode` and `stack_solve_algo=1` could fail to converge
|
||||
+ Simulation with `block` (but without `bytecode`) and `stack_solve_algo=1`
|
||||
gave wrong results in the last simulation period if the model has a block
|
||||
of type “Solve two boundaries simple/complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `bytecode` and `block` would give incorrect results if the
|
||||
model has a linear block of type “Solve forward simple/complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `block` (but without `bytecode`) would crash or give
|
||||
incorrect results if the model has a block of type “Solve forward/backward
|
||||
simple/complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `bytecode`, `block` and `stack_solve_algo={0,1,4}` would
|
||||
crash or give incorrect results if the model has a block of type “Solve
|
||||
forward/backward complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `block` (but without `bytecode`) gave incorrect results if
|
||||
the model has a block of type “Solve backward simple/complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `block` (with or without `bytecode`) could give incorrect
|
||||
results if the model has a nonlinear block of type “Solve forward/backward
|
||||
simple/complete”
|
||||
+ Simulation with `bytecode`, `block` and `stack_solve_algo=4` could give
|
||||
incorrect results if the model has a block of type “Solve backward/forward
|
||||
simple/complete” that follows a block of type “Solve two boundaries” (in
|
||||
the sense of the dependency graph)
|
||||
+ The convergence criterion in simulations with `block` (but without
|
||||
`bytecode`) was incorrect: the value of the `tolf` option from the `steady`
|
||||
command was used instead of the value of `tolf` option from the
|
||||
`perfect_foresight_solver` command
|
||||
* Various problems with steady state computation in combination with `block`
|
||||
and/or `bytecode` options of the `model` block:
|
||||
+ Steady state computation with `bytecode` and `block` could fail if some
|
||||
equations are marked `[static]`
|
||||
+ Steady state computation with `bytecode`, `block` and `solve_algo` ⩽ 4 or ⩾
|
||||
9 could fail
|
||||
+ Steady state computation with `bytecode`, `block` and `solve_algo=6` would
|
||||
crash or give incorrect results if the model has a block of type “Solve
|
||||
forward/backward complete”
|
||||
* The `check` command would crash or give incorrect results when using the
|
||||
`block` option of the `model` block and if the model has a block of type
|
||||
“Solve backward complete”
|
||||
* The `static` and `incidence` options of the `model_info` command did not work
|
||||
as documented in the reference manual
|
||||
* Various problems with the `method_of_moments` command:
|
||||
+ It would crash if no `matched_moments` block is present
|
||||
+ It would always load the full range of the first Excel sheet instead of the
|
||||
`xls_range` of the specified `xls_sheet`
|
||||
+ SMM would crash if a parameter draw triggers an error during
|
||||
`additional_optimizer_steps = 13`
|
||||
+ The `debug` option could not be passed to the command
|
||||
* In the `estimation` command, the `scale_file` field of the
|
||||
`posterior_sampler_options` option did not correctly load the scale
|
||||
* The `moments_varendo` option of the `estimation` command could crash for
|
||||
large models
|
||||
* The `resid` command would not show `name` tags when used in conjunction with
|
||||
the `ramsey_model` command
|
||||
* Simulations with the `occbin_solver` command would not work if there is only
|
||||
a surprise shock in the first period
|
||||
* The Liu & West auxiliary particle filter could enter infinite loops
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Announcement for Dynare 5.0 (on 2022-01-07)
|
||||
===========================================
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue