Manual: add warnings regarding the use of auxiliary variables
(@stepan removed trailing spaces)mr#1898
parent
cc04ef6ebf
commit
89b6ecf900
|
@ -3327,6 +3327,34 @@ blocks in the model structure and use this information to aid the
|
|||
solution process. These solution algorithms can provide a significant
|
||||
speed-up on large models.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning:: Be careful when employing auxiliary variables in the context
|
||||
of perfect foresight computations. The same model may work for stochastic
|
||||
simulations, but fail for perfect foresight simulations. The issue arises
|
||||
when an equation suddenly only contains variables dated ``t+1`` (or ``t-1``
|
||||
for that matter). In this case, the derivative in the last (first) period
|
||||
with respect to all variables will be 0, rendering the stacked Jacobian singular.
|
||||
|
||||
*Example*
|
||||
|
||||
Consider the following specification of an Euler equation with log utility:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
Lambda = beta*C(-1)/C;
|
||||
Lambda(+1)*R(+1)= 1;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Clearly, the derivative of the second equation with respect to all endogenous
|
||||
variables at time ``t`` is zero, causing ``perfect_foresight_solver`` to generally
|
||||
fail. This is due to the use of the Lagrange multiplier ``Lambda`` as an auxiliary
|
||||
variable. Instead, employing the identical
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
beta*C/C(+1)*R(+1)= 1;
|
||||
|
||||
will work.
|
||||
|
||||
.. command:: perfect_foresight_setup ;
|
||||
perfect_foresight_setup (OPTIONS...);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -10113,6 +10141,51 @@ with ``discretionary_policy`` or for optimal simple rules with ``osr``
|
|||
Optimal policy under commitment (Ramsey)
|
||||
----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Dynare allows to automatically compute optimal policy choices of a Ramsey planner
|
||||
who takes the specified private sector equilibrium conditions into account and commits
|
||||
to future policy choices. Doing so requires specifying the private sector equilibrium
|
||||
conditions in the ``model``-block and a ``planner_objective`` as well as potentially some
|
||||
``instruments`` to facilitate computations.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning:: Be careful when employing forward-looking auxiliary variables in the context
|
||||
of timeless perspective Ramsey computations. They may alter the problem the Ramsey
|
||||
planner will solve for the first period, although they seemingly leave the private
|
||||
sector equilibrium unaffected. The reason is the planner optimizes with respect to variables
|
||||
dated ``t`` and takes the value of time 0 variables as given, because they are predetermined.
|
||||
This set of initially predetermined variables will change with forward-looking definitions.
|
||||
Thus, users are strongly advised to use model-local variables instead.
|
||||
|
||||
*Example*
|
||||
|
||||
Consider a perfect foresight example where the Euler equation for the
|
||||
return to capital is given by
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
1/C=beta*1/C(+1)*(R(+1)+(1-delta))
|
||||
|
||||
The job of the Ramsey planner in period ``1`` is to choose :math:`C_1` and :math:`R_1`, taking as given
|
||||
:math:`C_0`. The above equation may seemingly equivalently be written as
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
1/C=beta*1/C(+1)*(R_cap);
|
||||
R_cap=R(+1)+(1-delta);
|
||||
|
||||
due to perfect foresight. However, this changes the problem of the Ramsey planner in the first period
|
||||
to choosing :math:`C_1` and :math:`R_1`, taking as given both :math:`C_0` and :math:`R^{cap}_0`. Thus,
|
||||
the relevant return to capital in the Euler equation of the first period is not a
|
||||
choice of the planner anymore due to the forward-looking nature of the definition in the second line!
|
||||
|
||||
A correct specification would be to instead define ``R_cap`` as a model-local variable:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
1/C=beta*1/C(+1)*(R_cap);
|
||||
#R_cap=R(+1)+(1-delta);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. command:: ramsey_model (OPTIONS...);
|
||||
|
||||
|br| This command computes the First Order Conditions for maximizing
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue