Merge pull request #1139 from JohannesPfeifer/Ramsey_documentation
Correct manual on Ramseytime-shift
commit
562b8f7a5c
|
@ -8052,11 +8052,10 @@ end;
|
||||||
This command computes the first order approximation of the policy that
|
This command computes the first order approximation of the policy that
|
||||||
maximizes the policy maker's objective function subject to the
|
maximizes the policy maker's objective function subject to the
|
||||||
constraints provided by the equilibrium path of the private economy and under
|
constraints provided by the equilibrium path of the private economy and under
|
||||||
commitment to this optimal policy. Following @cite{Woodford (1999)}, the Ramsey
|
commitment to this optimal policy. The Ramsey policy is computed
|
||||||
policy is computed using a timeless perspective. That is, the government forgoes
|
by approximating the equilibrium system around the perturbation point where the
|
||||||
its first-period advantage and does not exploit the preset privates sector expectations
|
Lagrange multipliers are at their steady state, i.e. where the Ramsey planner acts
|
||||||
(which are the source of the well-known time inconsistency that requires the
|
as if the initial multipliers had
|
||||||
assumption of commitment). Rather, it acts as if the initial multipliers had
|
|
||||||
been set to 0 in the distant past, giving them time to converge to their steady
|
been set to 0 in the distant past, giving them time to converge to their steady
|
||||||
state value. Consequently, the optimal decision rules are computed around this steady state
|
state value. Consequently, the optimal decision rules are computed around this steady state
|
||||||
of the endogenous variables and the Lagrange multipliers.
|
of the endogenous variables and the Lagrange multipliers.
|
||||||
|
@ -8113,14 +8112,16 @@ In addition, it stores the value of planner objective function under
|
||||||
Ramsey policy in @code{oo_.planner_objective_value}, given the initial values
|
Ramsey policy in @code{oo_.planner_objective_value}, given the initial values
|
||||||
of the endogenous state variables. If not specified with @code{histval}, they are
|
of the endogenous state variables. If not specified with @code{histval}, they are
|
||||||
taken to be at their steady state values. The result is a 1 by 2
|
taken to be at their steady state values. The result is a 1 by 2
|
||||||
vector, where the first entry stores the value of the planner objective under
|
vector, where the first entry stores the value of the planner objective when the initial Lagrange
|
||||||
the timeless perspective to Ramsey policy, i.e. where the initial Lagrange
|
|
||||||
multipliers associated with the planner's problem are set to their steady state
|
multipliers associated with the planner's problem are set to their steady state
|
||||||
values (@pxref{ramsey_policy}).
|
values (@pxref{ramsey_policy}).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In contrast, the second entry stores the value of the planner objective with
|
In contrast, the second entry stores the value of the planner objective with
|
||||||
initial Lagrange multipliers of the planner's problem set to 0, i.e. it is assumed
|
initial Lagrange multipliers of the planner's problem set to 0, i.e. it is assumed
|
||||||
that the planner succumbs to the temptation to exploit the preset private expecatations
|
that the planner exploits its ability to surprise private agents in the first
|
||||||
in the first period (but not in later periods due to commitment).
|
period of implementing Ramsey policy. This is the value of implementating
|
||||||
|
optimal policy for the first time and committing not to re-optimize in the future.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Because it entails computing at least a second order approximation, this
|
Because it entails computing at least a second order approximation, this
|
||||||
computation is skipped with a message when the model is too large (more than 180 state
|
computation is skipped with a message when the model is too large (more than 180 state
|
||||||
variables, including lagged Lagrange multipliers).
|
variables, including lagged Lagrange multipliers).
|
||||||
|
@ -14392,11 +14393,6 @@ Villemot, Sébastien (2011): ``Solving rational expectations models at
|
||||||
first order: what Dynare does,'' @i{Dynare Working Papers}, 2,
|
first order: what Dynare does,'' @i{Dynare Working Papers}, 2,
|
||||||
CEPREMAP
|
CEPREMAP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@item
|
|
||||||
Woodford, Michael (2011): ``Commentary: How Should Monetary Policy Be
|
|
||||||
Conducted in an Era of Price Stability?'' @i{Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole},
|
|
||||||
277-316
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@end itemize
|
@end itemize
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue