fix typos
parent
d9ede95ffa
commit
176afda1bc
|
@ -4838,21 +4838,21 @@ need of user intervention.
|
|||
The RMSE analysis can be performed with different types of sampling options:
|
||||
@enumerate
|
||||
@item
|
||||
When @code{pprior=1} and @code{ppost=0}, the toolbox analyzes the RMSE’s for
|
||||
When @code{pprior=1} and @code{ppost=0}, the toolbox analyzes the RMSEs for
|
||||
the Monte-Carlo sample obtained by sampling parameters from their prior distributions
|
||||
(or prior ranges): this analysis provides some hints about
|
||||
what parameter drives the fit of which observed series, prior to the full
|
||||
estimation;
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
When @code{pprior=0} and @code{ppost=0}, the toolbox analyzes the RMSE’s for
|
||||
When @code{pprior=0} and @code{ppost=0}, the toolbox analyzes the RMSEs for
|
||||
a multivariate normal Monte-Carlo sample, with covariance matrix based on
|
||||
the inverse Hessian at the optimum: this analysis is useful when maximum likelihood
|
||||
estimation is done (@i{i.e.} no Bayesian estimation);
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
When @code{ppost=1} the toolbox analyzes the RMSE’s for the posterior sample
|
||||
obtained by Dynare’s Metropolis procedure.
|
||||
When @code{ppost=1} the toolbox analyzes the RMSEs for the posterior sample
|
||||
obtained by Dynare's Metropolis procedure.
|
||||
@end enumerate
|
||||
|
||||
The use of cases 2 and 3 requires an estimation step beforehand. To
|
||||
|
@ -4904,34 +4904,34 @@ but the same conventions are used for multivariate normal and posterior):
|
|||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
@item
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_*.fig}: for each parameter, plots the cdf’s
|
||||
corresponding to the best 10% RMES’s of each observed series;
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_*.fig}: for each parameter, plots the cdfs
|
||||
corresponding to the best 10% RMSEs of each observed series;
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_dens_*.fig}: for each parameter, plots the
|
||||
pdf’s corresponding to the best 10% RMES’s of each observed series;
|
||||
pdfs corresponding to the best 10% RMESs of each observed series;
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_<name of observedseries>_corr_*.fig}: for
|
||||
each observed series plots the bi-dimensional projections of samples
|
||||
with the best 10% RMSE’s, when the correlation is significant;
|
||||
with the best 10% RMSEs, when the correlation is significant;
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_lnlik*.fig}: for each observed series, plots
|
||||
in red the cdf of the log-likelihood corresponding to the best 10%
|
||||
RMSE’s, in green the cdf of the rest of the sample and in blue the
|
||||
RMSEs, in green the cdf of the rest of the sample and in blue the
|
||||
cdf of the full sample; this allows one to see the presence of some
|
||||
idiosyncratic behavior;
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_lnpost*.fig}: for each observed series, plots
|
||||
in red the cdf of the log-posterior corresponding to the best 10% RMSE’s,
|
||||
in red the cdf of the log-posterior corresponding to the best 10% RMSEs,
|
||||
in green the cdf of the rest of the sample and in blue the cdf of the full
|
||||
sample; this allows one to see idiosyncratic behavior;
|
||||
|
||||
@item
|
||||
@code{<mod_file>_rmse_prior_lnprior*.fig}: for each observed series, plots
|
||||
in red the cdf of the log-prior corresponding to the best 10% RMSE’s,
|
||||
in red the cdf of the log-prior corresponding to the best 10% RMSEs,
|
||||
in green the cdf of the rest of the sample and in blue the cdf of the full
|
||||
sample; this allows one to see idiosyncratic behavior;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue