2015-04-06 12:13:14 +02:00
|
|
|
/*
|
2017-02-08 12:36:55 +01:00
|
|
|
* This file replicates (except for a small difference in the priors)the estimation of
|
|
|
|
* the cash in advance model described Frank Schorfheide (2000): "Loss function-based
|
|
|
|
* evaluation of DSGE models", Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(6), 645-670.
|
2015-04-06 12:13:14 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The data are in file "fs2000/fsdat_simul.m", and have been artificially generated.
|
|
|
|
* They are therefore different from the original dataset used by Schorfheide.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The equations are taken from J. Nason and T. Cogley (1994): "Testing the
|
|
|
|
* implications of long-run neutrality for monetary business cycle models",
|
|
|
|
* Journal of Applied Econometrics, 9, S37-S70.
|
|
|
|
* Note that there is an initial minus sign missing in equation (A1), p. S63.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This implementation was written by Michel Juillard. Please note that the
|
|
|
|
* following copyright notice only applies to this Dynare implementation of the
|
|
|
|
* model.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2022-04-13 13:15:19 +02:00
|
|
|
* Copyright © 2004-2017 Dynare Team
|
2015-04-06 12:13:14 +02:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file is part of Dynare.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Dynare is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
* the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
* (at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Dynare is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
* GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
2021-06-09 17:33:48 +02:00
|
|
|
* along with Dynare. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
|
2015-04-06 12:13:14 +02:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var m P c e W R k d n l gy_obs gp_obs y dA;
|
|
|
|
varexo e_a e_m;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parameters alp bet gam mst rho psi del;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
alp = 0.33;
|
|
|
|
bet = 0.99;
|
|
|
|
gam = 0.003;
|
|
|
|
mst = 1.011;
|
|
|
|
rho = 0.7;
|
|
|
|
psi = 0.787;
|
|
|
|
del = 0.02;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
model;
|
|
|
|
dA = exp(gam+e_a);
|
|
|
|
log(m) = (1-rho)*log(mst) + rho*log(m(-1))+e_m;
|
|
|
|
-P/(c(+1)*P(+1)*m)+bet*P(+1)*(alp*exp(-alp*(gam+log(e(+1))))*k^(alp-1)*n(+1)^(1-alp)+(1-del)*exp(-(gam+log(e(+1)))))/(c(+2)*P(+2)*m(+1))=0;
|
|
|
|
W = l/n;
|
|
|
|
-(psi/(1-psi))*(c*P/(1-n))+l/n = 0;
|
|
|
|
R = P*(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(-alp)/W;
|
|
|
|
1/(c*P)-bet*P*(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)/(m*l*c(+1)*P(+1)) = 0;
|
|
|
|
c+k = exp(-alp*(gam+e_a))*k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)+(1-del)*exp(-(gam+e_a))*k(-1);
|
|
|
|
P*c = m;
|
|
|
|
m-1+d = l;
|
|
|
|
e = exp(e_a);
|
|
|
|
y = k(-1)^alp*n^(1-alp)*exp(-alp*(gam+e_a));
|
|
|
|
gy_obs = dA*y/y(-1);
|
|
|
|
gp_obs = (P/P(-1))*m(-1)/dA;
|
|
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shocks;
|
|
|
|
var e_a; stderr 0.014;
|
|
|
|
var e_m; stderr 0.005;
|
|
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
steady_state_model;
|
|
|
|
dA = exp(gam);
|
|
|
|
gst = 1/dA;
|
|
|
|
m = mst;
|
|
|
|
khst = ( (1-gst*bet*(1-del)) / (alp*gst^alp*bet) )^(1/(alp-1));
|
|
|
|
xist = ( ((khst*gst)^alp - (1-gst*(1-del))*khst)/mst )^(-1);
|
|
|
|
nust = psi*mst^2/( (1-alp)*(1-psi)*bet*gst^alp*khst^alp );
|
|
|
|
n = xist/(nust+xist);
|
|
|
|
P = xist + nust;
|
|
|
|
k = khst*n;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
l = psi*mst*n/( (1-psi)*(1-n) );
|
|
|
|
c = mst/P;
|
|
|
|
d = l - mst + 1;
|
|
|
|
y = k^alp*n^(1-alp)*gst^alp;
|
|
|
|
R = mst/bet;
|
|
|
|
W = l/n;
|
|
|
|
ist = y-c;
|
|
|
|
q = 1 - d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gp_obs = m/dA;
|
|
|
|
gy_obs = dA;
|
|
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
steady;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
check;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
estimated_params;
|
|
|
|
alp, beta_pdf, 0.356, 0.02;
|
|
|
|
bet, beta_pdf, 0.993, 0.002;
|
|
|
|
gam, normal_pdf, 0.0085, 0.003;
|
|
|
|
mst, normal_pdf, 1.0002, 0.007;
|
2017-02-08 12:36:55 +01:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The prior on the autoregressive parameter rho is different from the one considered in the original paper.
|
|
|
|
* We lowered the prior variance to ensure that the prior does not have an asymptote at zero, which causes
|
|
|
|
* troubles for some optimizers. For instance, mode_compute=12 (which relies on Mathworks' particleswarm
|
|
|
|
* routine) finds a posterior at zero for rho (with a much higher posterior density than the one reported
|
|
|
|
* by csminwell or other optimization routines). Because zero is on the boundary of the prior, this is an
|
|
|
|
* an issue when we have to compute the hessian matrix (which is not full rank) at the mode or if we try to
|
|
|
|
* use this solution as an initial guess for csminwell.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
rho, beta_pdf, 0.129, 0.100;
|
2015-04-06 12:13:14 +02:00
|
|
|
psi, beta_pdf, 0.65, 0.05;
|
|
|
|
del, beta_pdf, 0.01, 0.005;
|
|
|
|
stderr e_a, inv_gamma_pdf, 0.035449, inf;
|
|
|
|
stderr e_m, inv_gamma_pdf, 0.008862, inf;
|
|
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
varobs gp_obs gy_obs;
|
|
|
|
options_.plot_priors=0;
|